To be
perfectly honest, I'm not a big fan of Jack Kerouac's writing, so I hesitated
before reading Lonesome Traveler. I
felt myself drifting a little in the middle of Kerouac's long-winded sentences,
and the detailed descriptions recounting his day didn't always hold my
interest. Although I enjoyed listening to Kerouac read selections from "Railroad
Earth," I was more transfixed by the beat of his voice and the fluid way
he read, rather than the story he was relating. While On the Road seemed to be a story of movement, mystery, and
spontaneity, I read "Railroad Earth" as a period of constancy and
increased certainty in Kerouac's life. The language Kerouac uses to describe
the railroad reminded me of his portrayal of the road--both being symbols of
freedom and eternity. However, Kerouac is employed as a consistent railroad
worker in this story, so he seems to be dreaming of the potential for adventure
that the railroad holds rather than experiencing it for himself.
Kerouac feels a sense of nostalgia for the type of life he led in On the Road, but he does not explicitly express
a sense of dissatisfaction for his current life and job. The passage that I
chose to discuss in class was slightly confusing, as it illustrates these competing views.
Kerouac's references to the past are not simply concerned with a few years previous,
but his thoughts extend back as far as childhood, as in the following passage:
"You see all the lil ranchstyle California homes and in
the evening people sipping in livingrooms open to the sweetness, the stars, the
hope that the lil children must see when they lay in little beds and bedtime
and look up and a star throbs for them above the railroad earth, and the train
calls, and they think tonite the stars will be out, they come, they leave, they
lave, they angelicize, ah me, I must come from a land where they let the
children cry, ah my, I wish I was a child in California..."
By using
language such as "sweetness," Kerouac associates nature with purity
and wonder, similar to the characterization of a child. The dreams Kerouac
describes are innocent and hopeful, as the children believe that stars emerge
for them and that they can rely on this truth. By aligning himself with the
railroads and open sky, Kerouac is expressing a desire for renewal, allowing
him to return to the uninhibited lifestyle of a previous time. The stars shine
and "angelisize" those underneath, reinforcing the idea that
everything and everyone can be holy. Although the children cry, Kerouac
expresses a desire to join them. It seems like society allows these children to
cry when dreams are lost to reality. However, Kerouac also suggests that children
can see the "throbbing hope-light shining," providing the promise of
a better future. Kerouac also speaks of the ideal farm home with its fence and harmonious family, illustrating the some of the conventional views that appear at odds
with Kerouac's love of the open road and lack of accountability. Toward the end
of this passage, Kerouac speaks of a train passing by the dream of this farmhouse,
ultimately showing how Kerouac's thoughts shift away from these desires in due
course.
I totally understand what you are saying by comparing Kerouac's writing and the difference in "On The Road" and "Lonesome Traveler." I felt that the tone of both stories matched the speed at which he wrote it. "Railroad Earth" literally drudged by for me and I was waiting for some excitement constantly. Where as "On the Road" almost had an overdose of adventure.
ReplyDeleteThis was a great post but I was captivated by something you said in the near-beginning about reading "The Railroad Earth" as a "period of constancy and increased certainty in Kerouac's life" in your eyes. To tell you the truth I agree with you because when I was reading it I couldn't help but consider how it differed from the romanticized transiency in "On the Road." However, isn't it sort of ironic that we consider Kerouac as stable in this work when his occupation requires him to work on trains, vehicles that are constantly on the move? Food for thought.
ReplyDelete